The Effects of the Civil War on the Marriage of
Southern Women
One of the interesting facts that I recently came
into consideration on was the fact that in the aftermath of the Civil War,
former slaves were not the only ones affected by the changes that would soon
come from the repercussions of the war. This is the fact that women were also
affected in regards to the fact that as many as 92% of southern women were
forced into spinsterhood, as there was not enough southern men in order for
them to marry
According to J. David Hacker, “If it is true that
the war condemned a generation of southern women to spinsterhood, then
demography, specifically the imbalance in the number of men and women,
contributed to what some historians have described as a war-provoked
"crisis in gender (p. 40).” This brings a key point the era of
Reconstruction as I feel that even though many historians call for more
research during this period, it is usually a topic that gets brushed to the
wayside for meatier topics such as the “Redemption of the South”.
Hacker brings up the point of
saying that “The vast majority (approximately 92 percent) of southern white
women who came of marriage age during the war married at some point in their
lives. Indeed, the marriage squeeze on southern women apparent in the 1870
census is no longer evident in the 1880 census (p. 42).” I feel that after the
era of Reconstruction, the crisis seems to be averted. But however one has to
look at the standpoint of the economic, demographic, and cultural contexts of
marriage patterns in the 19th century of the United States history.
The things with marriage in this time was that young couples were expected to
be able to have enough financial backing to properly provide for themselves,
particularly to have enough money in order to secure farm land, the equipment
needed to run the farm, and homes to thrive in the on the land they acquired. Hacker
goes on to say that, “As a result, marriages occurred several years earlier, on
average, in colonial America than in Europe, and much higher proportions of the
population eventually married (p. 42).”
He also brings up the point that it marriage also depended on the
presence of desirable alternatives to marriage, going on to say that 20th
century scholars have seen that women in that day were more likely to postpone
marriage to have greater opportunities for education and to join the paid labor
force.
Hacker brings up another interesting point
regarding the cultural expectation and appropriate age differences between men
and women during this time. “Although
this difference suggests that many young women would be forced to delay
marriage or remain permanently single, the greater tendency for men to remarry after
widowhood ensured that most women in the nineteenth century eventually married
(p. 44).” At the outbreak of the Civil War with the bombing of Fort Sumter on
April 12th 1861, this caused many men of appropriate marriage age to
be shipped out to fight a war.
I feel that they fact that the
war eventually broke and caused many men to die for a “noble cause” severely
hindered the growth of the Southern population after the war. The fact this
notion would add to the white southerners paranoia that former slaves wanted
nothing better than to inter marry with the white women of the south who many
would consider to be “vulnerable and threatened” by a large group of men who
were essentially free from the bounds of slavery.
Hacker, J. D., Libra Hilde, and James H.
Jones. "The Effects of the Civil War on Southern Marriage Patterns."
The Journal of Southern History 76.1 (2010): 40-45. Web. 1 May 2013.
I feel that your blog is something that is not talked about frequently. It is one of those things that is interesting and overlapped. I agree completely that the mass amount of death hindered the population growth of the south for decades to follow and the threat of former slaves to inter marry increased segregation.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jeremy. This is something that never gets discussed. I remember learning a little about how the wives were forced to take control of the plantations while their husbands were off at war, similarly to how they did during the American Revolution. But I have never really heard about the discrepancy in numbers between men and women of the time. Although it does make total sense on why it would be that way.
ReplyDelete