On the eve of the Civil War, not only
were American born men gearing up for the soon to be fighting, but so
were immigrants who had fled to the United States years before the
war. In the late 1840s, thousands of German immigrants came to the
States after the failed 1848 Revolution. Of the total population in
1860, nearly 1,300,000 were German immigrants. Many of the
German-Americans who fought in the war, mainly for the Union, were
refugees or military leaders of other revolutions in Germany. Even
though they were fighting on the Union side, some German-American
soldier's got the bad end of the situation, including German leader
Franz Sigel.
Sigel was a graduate of a German
military school and served as a general in the 1848 German revolution
in efforts to unify Germany. After the revolution, he left for
England, and then in 1852, arrived in America. He continued to serve
as a military leader for the 5th New York Infantry, and
then served as a professor of history and mathematics at a
German-American Institute in New York until the outbreak of the war.
He organized a German infantry to fight for the United States, and
was sent to Missouri where he helped capture Confederate guards at
Camp Jackson in May 1861 and assisted Nathaniel Lyons campaign, as
well as the Battle of Wilson's Creek. Even though the Union lost at
the first battle of the war, Sigel was still regarded with admiration
of those he did come into contact with, having always been energetic
and showed the utmost devotion to the Union cause while in battle.
He was upgraded to general in a short period of time, and in November
1861 because of health reasons, left to go to St. Louis to recover
for a month. In that time, his forces were given to another general,
because they were classified as “rowdy Germans” and no one could
contain them other than Sigel. When Sigel returned, he was upset to
find that news out that he had been replaced.
The following month, Sigel resigned
from the Union army, stating that there had been no reason for him to
be replaced when he was coming back. Sigel felt the loss of honor and
justice he had felt when he first registered with the military,
almost as a dig at his military skill and tactic. Because Sigel was
so well liked by all the forces, his general Halleck tried to get him
to rethink his resignation or else there would be riots. But Sigel
was not happy with the explanations he was given, claiming that
before he had taken leave in November, that he had been told other
divisions were going to be given to him, but they never were.
Instead, they were assigned elsewhere and he did not want to be seen
as a deceiving officer, and he still wished to resign. He had shown
extreme loyalty to the Union, and the Union could not return the same
in his favor.
Upon hearing of Sigel's resignation
and reasons why, the German-American population rose up to Sigel's
side claiming he had been treated unfairly by the generals in the
army. Thousands of leaders in the German-American population
expressed disgust at his mistreatment. Soon, hundreds of newspapers
across the country was showing support for Sigel with their
headlines. Petitions were brought to Lincoln to have Sigel reinstated
as major general. The public outcry was too strong at this point to
be ignored and in March of 1862, Sigel was reinstated. Because of
Lincoln's support, waves of immigration support started as well.
Underneath the reinstatement, other officers in the army were
starting to investigate Sigel's skills as a military commander. After
realizing that he was not a very good leader after all, they tried to
get him to leave again, though that was unable to happen. Sigel was
later promoted two other times after that, though he later failed to
live up to his reputation in the early years of the war later on.
Sigel was not the only officer to use political uprisings to further
military careers, especially in damaging the interests of his people,
and the misfortune was one to learn from.
Hess, Earl J. "Sigel's Resignation: A Study in German-Americanism and the Civil War." Civil War History, Volume 26, Number 1, March 1980,pp. 5-17.
No comments:
Post a Comment