Civil War Weaponry
During the Civil War the production of weapons greatly
increased. There was a new demand for more reliable firearms. Prior to the
Civil War most soldiers carried muskets which only could only carry one bullet
at a time. So after every shot the soldier was forced to reload the musket
which could take several minutes to do, most times they would have to force the
ball down the barrel using a mallet due to the balls diameter being almost the
same as the barrels. The musket had a range of around 250 yards but was only
effectively accurate up to about eighty yards.
Most of the soldiers carried rifles
during the Civil War. These rifles could shoot a bullet up to about 1000 yards (four times as
far as the musket).It was also far more accurate due to the new discovery of the
process and benefits of rifling the
inside of the barrels of the guns. Rifling is the shallow spiral engraving down
the inside of the barrel causing the bullet to spin. This forced the enemy to
change the way they moved, even troops far from the line of fire was forced to
take cover and build trenches and other types of fortification to protect
themselves from fire. Not only did they carry these long range rifles they also
carried a new form of bullet called the Miniѐ Bullet. This development
transformed warfare during the nineteenth. The new bullet was slightly smaller
than the old ball so it slid down the barrel easily making them easier and
faster to load. This new bullet was also cylindrical in shaped (much more like
modern bullets than the older lead balls). The cylindrical bullets
contained a hollow base that expanded when fired giving it lethal accuracy at a
longer range. It is estimated that the rifle and the Miniѐ Bullet account for
about ninety percent of all civil war casualties.
In 1863 a whole new gun came to the battlefield known as a
repeater. These guns were headlined by
the Spencer Carbine which was able to shoot seven times before the soldier
would have to reload. They came with a box capable of holding ten seven round spring
loading magazines. However these new guns were only available to the union
soldiers from the north. The south did not have the equipment, resources, or
knowledge to produce these ground breaking rifles. Even if the Confederates did
manage to get ahold of these rifles they did not have the copper to produce
more ammo. These rifles became a favorite for Union generals and soldiers
alike. Major-General James H. Wilson
wrote the following about them "There is no doubt that the Spencer carbine
is the best fire-arm yet put into the hands of the soldier, both for economy of
ammunition and maximum effect, physical and moral. Our best officers estimate
one man armed with it is equivalent to three with any other arm. I have never
seen anything else like the confidence inspired by it in the regiments or
brigades which have it. A common belief amongst them is if their flanks are
covered they can go anywhere. I have seen a large number of dismounted charges
made with them against cavalry, infantry, and breast-works, and never knew one to
fail.”
The more advanced weapons available
almost exclusively to the Union armies gave them a great advantage on the
battle. With the combination of better weaponry, transportation of people and
equipment, and just more soldiers to fight for them gave the Union the edge in
the war.
Pritchard, Russ A. Civil War
Weapons and Equipment. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press, 2003. Print.
Over the course of the years that I have had History courses, even dating all the way back to high school I have always heard that the North had the eventual "upper hand" in the war due to a higher population and better economy than that of the south. This is one of the first times I have seen another area that the North had a superiority in, and to be frank, it makes a lot of sense. As we have seen time and time again throughout history, the side that is better armed and has better weapons tends to always shift the scale of battle in their favor. I was completely unaware that the invention of the repeater had come so early on in our history. If you add in the fact that it was a much better weapon than anything the south could manufacture it would turn the tides of battle by a landslide. It is also worth mentioning that I find it odd that the south had none of the technologies to manufacture the same weapons. Did you happen to see anything that would indicate why this happened?
ReplyDelete