Thursday, May 2, 2013

Nate Back's opinion on Champ Ferguson


Confederate Outlaw was hands down the most interesting book for HIS 424.  I really enjoyed reading it and I feel a bit disappointed I missed the discussion on it and its topic: Champ Ferguson.  Ferguson was not a sympathetic individual.  He was rough and ready.   While reading the book, I had a lot of comparison and contrasts with media.  Ferguson reminded me of many different characters from varied fictional works and genres.  Among them is of course Josey Wales from the 1976 Clint Eastwood film The Outlaw Josey Wales and the Stranger from High Plains Drifter came to mind as I read his actions.   The general Spaghetti Western type desperado that is not influenced by Yojimbo has similiarities in my mind with Ferguson.  The odd ball out in this discussion is the character of Rorschach from the 1985 graphic novel Watchman.  The Rorschach and Ferguson similarity in my mind is the stark black and white view of the world but the similarities end there, afterall, Rorschach was a psychopathic mask wearing vigilante and Ferguson was a bushwhacking guerilla.  If I had to pick someone that would have played a good Ferguson, I would have to pick Lee Van Cleef.
Honestly, I don’t know how to feel about Ferguson’s legacy and its connection with Kentucky.  Don’t get me wrong, I find Ferguson interesting; it’s just that I don’t like the idea of Kentucky having so many 19th century miscreants.  Among these miscreants is the McCoy clan of the infamous Hatfield and McCoy feud.  If we include Ferguson into the Kentucky tradition, it lowers the bar in all honesty.  I am not saying that we forget that he existed or try to play “pin the guerrilla on Tennessee” but should look at him as an individual and not so much as a Kentuckian or Tennessean.  But then again, Ferguson adds a sort of mystique to it all.  He adds some flavor to our State’s history, albeit the history of our far southern region.  I guess what I am getting at is that it’s all about how we interpret the events.  As long as Ferguson is not upheld as a folk hero or at least his actions are remembered as the evil that they were, it won’t be as bad.   

3 comments:

  1. I agree that the Champ Ferguson book was very interesting. The most interesting part for me was that no one really knows Ferguson's true motives. Was it a cause, hatred, or just an excuse to enjoy killing? It doesn't surprise me that he came from Kentucky, but I am still in awe that southern Kentucky had enough Union support to oust Ferguson during the war.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know what to make of Champ Ferguson. I simply consider him a calculated psychopath dead set on remaining free. That's the irony of the book given that he was fighting his own war for freedom among the Civil War.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I completely agree with that fact that we shouldn't look to Ferguson as a folk hero of sorts. However, that fact of the matter is that I could imagine many individuals seeing him as so. Yes, he may have been a raging psychopath hellbent on the destruction of mankind, but the mystery surrounding him only makes him all the more infamous. No matter how good or bad we can view his actions, at the end of the day he is still a sight to behold.

    ReplyDelete